W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Clarification on MessageId

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:38:02 -0500
To: pyendluri@webmethods.com
Cc: chinthaka@wso2.com, paul.downey@bt.com, public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org, Tony.Rogers@ca.com
Message-ID: <OF31725D01.2E62EEC8-ON8525710E.007657B9-8525710E.0076D700@us.ibm.com>
+1

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295

public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 02/07/2006 03:21:16 PM:

> True. BTW, the scheme and namespace must occur in that order  like 
> urn:uuid:<aUniqueNumber>
> Eran's note shows them reversed  "uuid:urn:<aUniqueNumber>". I hope 
> that was a typo.
> 
> 
> Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> 
> Exactly, 
> 
> You need to use both prefixes. One is the scheme (urn:) and the other is 
the 
> urn: namespace id (uuid) 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
> phone: +1 508 377 9295 
> 
> public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 02/07/2006 02:12:53 AM:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > I would have thought that one might use EITHER uuid: OR urn: as a 
> > > prefix to the message id - using both seems a little excessive. 
> > 
> > > Perhaps one of our MS representatives might care to comment?
> > 
> > or prehaps anyone with the wits to read RFC4122 ;-)
> > 
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 21:38:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT