W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Clarification on MessageId

From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:21:16 -0800
Message-ID: <43E9013C.4020103@webmethods.com>
To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
CC: paul.downey@bt.com, chinthaka@wso2.com, public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org, Tony.Rogers@ca.com
True. BTW, the scheme and namespace must occur in that order  like 
urn:uuid:<aUniqueNumber>
Eran's note shows them reversed  "uuid:urn:<aUniqueNumber>". I hope that 
was a typo.


Christopher B Ferris wrote:

>
> Exactly,
>
> You need to use both prefixes. One is the scheme (urn:) and the other 
> is the
> urn: namespace id (uuid)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
>
> public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 02/07/2006 02:12:53 AM:
>
> >
> >
> > > I would have thought that one might use EITHER uuid: OR urn: as a
> > > prefix to the message id - using both seems a little excessive.
> >  
> > > Perhaps one of our MS representatives might care to comment?
> >
> > or prehaps anyone with the wits to read RFC4122 ;-)
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt
> >
> > Paul
> >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 21:26:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT