Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc

(oops, reply-to-all this time)

On 2/2/06, Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@sun.com> wrote:
> That idea trouble me a bit, the SOAP processing model is all or
> nothing, allowing some headers to be processed and others to be
> ignored (at least for mU processing) diverges from the spec as I read
> it.

Yup.

I'd say that with a 202 response, the recipient can only assume that
the SOAP processing model has *not* been followed by the recipient.

Mark.