W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 06:08:50 +1100
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0602021108g99856bes916a3eb5594838f9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@sun.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

(oops, reply-to-all this time)

On 2/2/06, Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@sun.com> wrote:
> That idea trouble me a bit, the SOAP processing model is all or
> nothing, allowing some headers to be processed and others to be
> ignored (at least for mU processing) diverges from the spec as I read
> it.


I'd say that with a 202 response, the recipient can only assume that
the SOAP processing model has *not* been followed by the recipient.

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 19:08:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:12 UTC