Re: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations

Christopher B Ferris wrote:
>
> There is an important, yet subtle distinction not captured in the
> table (either version).
>
> The SOAP MU fault will ALWAYS travel on the HTTP response REGARDLESS
> of what the wsa:faultTo, wsa:ReplyTo, etc. say. Thus, I think that you
> have to make
> it clear that this applies only to faults that are NOT SOAP-specific
> faults (MU and
> VM). Saying that the fault MAY be sent on the transport-specific
> backchannel is
> not enough. I think it needs to be made clear when this will be the
> case and when it
> will not.
This is a "Tony's Timeline" issue.  In case of an MU fault, WSA is not
engaged and none of the table applies.

It occurs to me that this distinction might be part of folklore but not
really written down anywhere official.