Who is Tony and why does he have a timeline? I'm missing the connection. Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440 phone: +1 508 377 9295 David Hull <dmh@tibco.com> wrote on 08/14/2006 04:13:15 PM: > Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > There is an important, yet subtle distinction not captured in the > table (either version). > > The SOAP MU fault will ALWAYS travel on the HTTP response REGARDLESS > of what the wsa:faultTo, wsa:ReplyTo, etc. say. Thus, I think that > you have to make > it clear that this applies only to faults that are NOT SOAP-specific > faults (MU and > VM). Saying that the fault MAY be sent on the transport-specific > backchannel is > not enough. I think it needs to be made clear when this will be the > case and when it > will not. > This is a "Tony's Timeline" issue. In case of an MU fault, WSA is > not engaged and none of the table applies. > > It occurs to me that this distinction might be part of folklore but > not really written down anywhere official.
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 00:30:28 UTC