W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > October 2005

Re: Minutes of the Palo Alto F2F

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:03:23 -0700
Message-Id: <8BC7ED83-F7F3-4C93-8A77-ABC7999CE842@bea.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
To: "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>

I've added topic headers and made other adjustments; please take a look.


On 13/10/2005, at 7:54 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:


>
> I e-mailed all of the resolutions that I had text for to the list,  
> so if it's not there, we don't have it unfortunately.
>
> I'll endeavour to add headers in the appropriate places. On Monday,  
> we can ask if there's any objection to changing the minutes to  
> reflect the text below.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On 13/10/2005, at 4:16 PM, Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
>>> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Mark Nottingham
>>> Sent: Thursday, Oct 06, 2005 11:34 AM
>>> To: W3C WS Coordination Group
>>> Subject: Minutes of the Palo Alto F2F
>>>
>>> ... are available for review at:
>>>    http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/09/f2f-minutes.html
>>>
>>> and attached for convenience.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I was about to send the resolution of cr4 to the WS-RX tc, but this
>> little nagging detail stopped me.
>>
>> I hate to observe that the minutes are not very comprehensible in  
>> many
>> places. For example, the issue that I raised is cr4. The  
>> discussion is
>> not clearly marked in the minutes ("mnot: Next is Umit's anon URI"  
>> will
>> be hard to remember 4 months from now on!). Same with other CR  
>> issues,
>> like the next one Glen raised. It is simply buried in the text  
>> since it
>> is not marked with a header. I think the minutes need some editing
>> before we can accept the minutes, like adding appropriate delimiters
>> with headers.
>>
>> I recall regarding the cr4 issue that I have raised from the ws-rx  
>> tc,
>> we had a clear writeup text that was obvious at the time  
>> (projected from
>> Mark's Mac during the f2f), but I do not really see the full text  
>> in the
>> minutes, but only two snippets of text to change
>>
>> Based on my recollection, this is what I thought we agreed on:
>>
>> Instead of the current text in SOAP binding spec in section 3.5
>>
>> {When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is  
>> specified as
>> the address of the ReplyTo or FaultTo EPR, the underlying SOAP  
>> protocol
>> binding provides a channel to the specified endpoint. Any underlying
>> protocol binding supporting the SOAP request-response message  
>> exchange
>> pattern provides such a channel. For instance, the SOAP 1.2 HTTP
>> binding[SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts] puts the reply message in the HTTP
>> response.
>> }
>>
>> We will have
>>
>> {When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is  
>> specified as
>> the address of an EPR, such as the ReplyTo or FaultTo EPR, the
>> underlying SOAP protocol binding provides a channel to the specified
>> endpoint. Any underlying protocol binding supporting the SOAP
>> request-response message exchange pattern provides such a channel for
>> response messages. For instance, the SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding[SOAP  
>> 1.2 Part
>> 2: Adjuncts] puts the reply message in the HTTP response.
>> }
>>
>> Note that the only difference with what is recorded in the minutes  
>> (and
>> reflected to the CR resolution) and what I remember is the clause (",
>> such as ...") which appears editorial, but I thought I should  
>> bring this
>> up. In my opinion, my recollection provides clearer text, but I  
>> want to
>> check since I want to send it to the ws-rx tc.
>>
>> Mark, do you still have the full text on your Mac to finalize this?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --umit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
> Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
>
>
>
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Friday, 14 October 2005 06:12:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:09 GMT