W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > June 2005

RE: Proposal for lc75/lc88

From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:10:22 +1000
Message-ID: <7997F38251504E43B38435DAF917887F40C567@ausyms23.ca.com>
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Have we included elsewhere the requirement that the receiver MUST return the message id in any reply to this message?
 
BTW: is the message id required in any fault returned in response to the message? I would expect it to be required where it is being used for correlation.
 
Tony Rogers

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Mark Nottingham 
	Sent: Tue 14-Jun-05 7:56 
	To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Proposal for lc75/lc88
	
	


	The value of [message id] uniquely identifies the message. When
	present, it is the responsibility of the sender to insure that each
	message is uniquely identified. A receiver MAY treat all messages that
	contain the same [message id] as the same message. No specific
	algorithm for the generation of unique values of [message id] is given,
	however methods such as the use of an IRI that exists within a domain
	owned by the sender combined with a sequence satisfies the uniqueness
	criteria but may not be the best practice from a security perspective.
	
	--
	Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
	Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
	
	
	
	
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 01:10:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:05 GMT