W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > July 2005

Re: Proposal for XML version independence

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:09:41 -0400
Message-ID: <42DD5E05.80605@datapower.com>
To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

According to my reading of your diff.html, it seems that what you did is 
replace things "xs:any" with "xs:any in XML 1.0 Serialization" and do 
not add anything about XML 1.1 serialization.  Therefore, the document 
still only defines XML 1.0, although it makes XML 1.1, etc., legal 
because they are "out of scope"; someone would still have to do the work 
to normatively define what the XML 1.1 equivalents are.

I don't see the benefit of this change.

I have a simpler proposal which achieves the same result:  add text like 
the following somewhere in the notational conventions section:
	Note that all schema constructs in this document are to be
	taken as XML Schema 1.0 for XML 1.0 serialization

Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 20:09:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:10 UTC