W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2005

RE: Snapshots of the drafts for review

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:22:04 -0800
To: paul.downey@bt.com, hugo@w3.org, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050128072204807.00000003752@amalhotr-pc>

Yes, we shd reference RFC3986.  We shd also consider referencing RFC3987 (the IRI specification).

All the best, Ashok
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> paul.downey@bt.com
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 6:54 AM
> To: hugo@w3.org; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Snapshots of the drafts for review
> 
> 
> from a quick read, i'm happy with these, apart from section 
> 2.3 which stands out like a sore thumb. i'll raise a separate Email.
> 
> two editorial comments (not required for this publication):
> 
> - i thought we'd agreed at the F2F to reference RFC3986 rather
>   than RFC2396bis?
> 
> - it might be nice to populate the non-normative Acknowledgements
>   for those of us in need of a small ego boost :-)
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: 28 January 2005 10:05
> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Snapshots of the drafts for review
> 
> 
> WG members,
> 
> As discussed on this week's call, please find below links to 
> snapshots of the drafts that we will consider for republication:
> 
>     Core
>  
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr
-core.html
> ?rev=1.12
> 
>     SOAP binding
>  
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr
-soap.html
> ?rev=1.11
> 
>     WSDL binding
>  
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr
-wsdl.html
> ?rev=1.11
> 
> When we agree to publish those, I'll work on 
> pubrules-compliant copies and give them to the Webmaster team.
> 
> [ Even though I don't see an action item on me to do so, I remember
>   being asked to regenerate the drafts and send out such an email. ]
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hugo
> 
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 15:22:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:01 GMT