W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2005

RE: Snapshots of the drafts for review

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:54:05 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DF4B@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <hugo@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

from a quick read, i'm happy with these, apart from section 2.3
which stands out like a sore thumb. i'll raise a separate Email.

two editorial comments (not required for this publication):

- i thought we'd agreed at the F2F to reference RFC3986 rather 
  than RFC2396bis?

- it might be nice to populate the non-normative Acknowledgements
  for those of us in need of a small ego boost :-)

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Hugo Haas
Sent: 28 January 2005 10:05
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: Snapshots of the drafts for review


WG members,

As discussed on this week's call, please find below links to snapshots
of the drafts that we will consider for republication:

    Core
 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-core.html
?rev=1.12

    SOAP binding
 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-soap.html
?rev=1.11

    WSDL binding
 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-wsdl.html
?rev=1.11

When we agree to publish those, I'll work on pubrules-compliant copies
and give them to the Webmaster team.

[ Even though I don't see an action item on me to do so, I remember
  being asked to regenerate the drafts and send out such an email. ]

Cheers,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 14:53:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:01 GMT