- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:06:37 +1100
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
This is now issue 045; http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i044 On Jan 17, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Hugo Haas wrote: > > -=- Title -=- > > Definition of the rules to reply to a message in Core 3.2 > > -=- Description -=- > > The Core spec, section 3.2 Formulating a Reply Message[1], states: > > The reply to a WS-Addressing compliant request message MUST be > compliant to WS-Addressing and be constructed according to the rules > defined in this section. > > However, this section only defines an example and no rules. > > -=- Justification -=- > > I believe that it's useful to have clear rules to formulate a reply > message. > > -=- Target -=- > > Core > > -=- Proposal -=- > > Spell out rules for replying to a message, which I believe to be: > - select reply endpoint, fault, or source EPR, depending on the type > of message being replied and the information found in the first > message > - use the EPR's [address] property as the [destination] MAP > - use the [message id] MAP as the [relationthip] URI with the right > relationship type > - echo the EPR's [referance properties] and [reference parameters] as > SOAP headers > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ > > -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 03:06:39 UTC