W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2005

Re: NEW ISSUE: Definition of the rules to reply to a message in Core 3.2 [i044]

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:06:37 +1100
Message-Id: <772C04F7-6B59-11D9-859B-000A95BD86C0@bea.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>

This is now issue 045;
   http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i044


On Jan 17, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Hugo Haas wrote:

>
> -=- Title -=-
>
> Definition of the rules to reply to a message in Core 3.2
>
> -=- Description -=-
>
> The Core spec, section 3.2 Formulating a Reply Message[1], states:
>
>  The reply to a WS-Addressing compliant request message MUST be
>  compliant to WS-Addressing and be constructed according to the rules
>  defined in this section.
>
> However, this section only defines an example and no rules.
>
> -=- Justification -=-
>
> I believe that it's useful to have clear rules to formulate a reply
> message.
>
> -=- Target -=-
>
> Core
>
> -=- Proposal -=-
>
> Spell out rules for replying to a message, which I believe to be:
> - select reply endpoint, fault, or source EPR, depending on the type
>  of message being replied and the information found in the first
>  message
> - use the EPR's [address] property as the [destination] MAP
> - use the [message id] MAP as the [relationthip] URI with the right
>  relationship type
> - echo the EPR's [referance properties] and [reference parameters] as
>  SOAP headers
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
> -- 
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
>
>

--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 03:06:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:01 GMT