W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2005

RE: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks

From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:00:36 +1100
Message-ID: <7997F38251504E43B38435DAF917887F40C361@ausyms23.ca.com>
To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
What? I can't tell someone to retry after a millennium? :-)
You are assuming a unit of measure of milliseconds. If we move to a unit of say, microseconds, then an xs:unsignedInt becomes inadequate. I'd rather use a 64 bit integer to ensure that we have heaps of headroom.
Tony Rogers

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Rich Salz 
	Sent: Tue 01-Mar-05 6:43 
	To: Jonathan Marsh 
	Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org 
	Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks

	> tooling.  I propose we define RetryAfter as xs:unsignedLong.
	Hmm, /1000/86400/365.25/1000000 means about 584 million years, right?
	If you pick xs:unsignedInt we fit into 32 bits and get /1000/86400 or
	about 49 days.
	I propose we define RetryAfter as xs:unsignedInt
	        /r$, looking forward to seeing you folks tomorrow :)
	Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
	DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
	XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 21:01:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:08 UTC