W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2005

RE: endpoint definition

From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 04:01:05 -0000
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA8001CA7D19@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

> Me, sneaky? 8-)

Oh yeah. Sneaking in that "resource" word. That stuff's all happening
over at OASIS mate :-)
 
> That would be a significant restriction over what's permitted by the
> current definition, and would prevent a whole lot of Web-style
> interactions.  -1

Resource is potentially overloaded in this context (unfortunately).
Obviously you know my MESTian viewpoint on this, and I your RESTafarian
viewpoint - can we compromise on some other noun?

Jim
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 04:01:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:03 GMT