W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Thoughts on TAG issue EndpointsRef47

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:02:00 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DFC6@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <tom@coastin.com>
Cc: <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
> Would you say the mapping from a logical wsa:to element to the way the
> message is transported is part of ws-addressing?
> If not, where is this mapping specified?

somewhere else above and beyond this spec.

i think there may indeed be systems which accept EPRs from unknown parties 
and blindly send a reply, and that's fine.
 
*but* many async scenarios involve some out of band negotialtion before the 
messaging occurs. A sender may elect to only send messages to parties 
known and use configuration to decide upon the actual means of transport.
 
my company is keen to ensure that it's possible to build both styles of
architecture with this low-level component.
 
Paul
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 09:01:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:03 GMT