W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2005

issue 017, subissue b -- proposal in light of WSD's best practice decision

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:29:14 -0800
Message-ID: <4207C18A.7000607@oracle.com>
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

I took an action during last week's telcon to look at the proposal that 
I sent before [1], in light of the fact that the WSD WG has decided to 
make the ONM feature a best practice [2], instead of a requirement.

Given that the [action] value is not required to be distinct it seems to 
me that no change has to be made to the proposal. The proposal would 
allow a WSDL creator who wants to follow the best practice of WSDL 2.0 
(in the case where the [action] values are indeed distinct) a way to 
specifically call out the fact that the [action] value satisfies the ONM.

Please note that Jonathan has also proposed [3] adding text to both the 
WSDL 2.0 and WS-Addressing specs to resolve this subissue.

-Anish
--

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Jan/att-0010/00-part
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jan/0091.html
[3] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Feb/0020.html
Received on Monday, 7 February 2005 19:29:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:03 GMT