W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2005

RE: Action Item

From: Cahill, Conor P <conor.p.cahill@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:28:15 -0800
Message-ID: <8AEB79DC01BE994D8DE3FD02FA5B475B024C9F2E@orsmsx409>
To: "John Kemp" <john.kemp@nokia.com>, "ext Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>


> When submitting a message for potentially asynchronous 
> processing, it would seem that the response message must come 
> back on a different channel than that used to submit the request.

I'm not sure this is the case.  There are many situations where
the client and server can maintain a permanent connection pipeline
to asynchronously send messages back and forth where the server 
is not able to separately connect to the client (most instant
messaging services work this way).

Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2005 18:38:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:12 UTC