W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Action Item

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:53:55 -0500
To: "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <54E8F43C-242F-48FF-A099-C7AC17980AD6@Sun.COM>
Another thought: do we actually need <Anonymous>optional</Anonymous>  
since that is synonymous with the absence of <Anonymous> ?

Marc.

On Dec 2, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:

> This completes my action item from last week [1].
>
> Please find the updated writeup for the  option1 [2] named  
> ProposalLast. Purple is the changed/new text in comparison to the  
> editor's draft [3].
>
> Let me remind everyone that this writeup reflects the consensus  
> point of the f2f and past 2 weeks discussion in the tc to rewrite  
> the agreed semantics up to this point.
>
> - We have two elements, UsingAddressing and Anonymous (changed from  
> AnonymousUse as suggested last week)
> - UsingAddressing may appear in binding/endpoint. (as it is)
> - I removed the default attribute, however UsingAddressing  
> indicates support for both anon and non-anon URIs as addresses as  
> it was in the previous writeup [2].
>
> - Anonymous element uses required/prohibited/allowed as values. It  
> can only appear within a binding operation. The values are changed  
> per the decision last week [1].
>
> - SOAP1.1/HTTP binding is described. I cleaned it up from the last  
> writeup [2].
> - I deleted one of the examples.
>
> David Hull, I did NOT include your suggestions to this as I have  
> made some changes to the current SOAP1.1/HTTP section (some  
> restructuring/simplification). Since you felt that your changes  
> were additive, my suggestion for you is to take the text and  
> illustrate the changes with this latest writeup.  I really do not  
> have the cycles to include your text and find the conflicts/ 
> synergy, at least not this week, or whatever is left of it :-(
>
> Marc, editorial comments are appreciated esp. with the last  
> paragraph of 3.1 prior to 3.1.1 if we decide to use this writeup in  
> the spec.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --umit
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/11/28-ws-addr-minutes.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/ 
> 2005Nov/0084.html
> [3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr- 
> wsdl.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
>
>
> Ps. It feels like Jonathan is trying to take the wind from my sails  
> with the policy assertion debate :-D.
> <<ProposalLastWithoutDefaults.html>>
> ----------------------
>
> Dr. Umit Yalcinalp
> Standards Architect
> NetWeaver Industry Standards
> SAP Labs, LLC
> umit.yalcinalp@sap.com
> Tel: (650) 320-3095
>
> <ProposalLastWithoutDefaults.html>

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.




Received on Monday, 5 December 2005 20:54:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:10 GMT