Re: wsa:To -> SOAP1.2's ImmediateDestination

I think that's the point of contention.

Cheers,


On 24/08/2005, at 8:27 PM, Mark Baker wrote:

> Marc's example described a single message path, so
> I knew SH3 couldn't be a reverse proxy, since such a configuration
> involves (at least) two messages, two message paths, two ultimate
> recipients, in SOAP terms.


--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems

Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 16:26:32 UTC