W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > April 2005

Re: i058 resolution text

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:22:41 -0700
Message-ID: <426746B1.1030602@oracle.com>
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> The following properties were found by the WG to represent run-time
> information and therefore static description of them doesn't have
> sufficient utility to warrant adding WSDL extensions to control their
> values:
>   [source endpoint]
>   [reply endpoint]
>   [fault endpoint]
>   [message ID]
> [relationship] is a pair of IRI values, of which one (message
> identifier) is run-time and not directly describable in WSDL.
> Describing a relationship alone does not provide much value.

To be pedantic, providing a generic way of describing a relationship 
perhaps does not provide much value. This is to emphasize the fact that 
there are cases where specifying the relationship IRI statically in WSDL 
does provide value -- such as in the case of relating two one-way 
operations in WSDL to provide an async higher level request-response -- 
but those cases are better served by the usecase specific extensions 
(which have to be added in any case).


> We already are designing mechanisms to control [action].
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2005 06:25:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:09 UTC