- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:22:41 -0700
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Jonathan Marsh wrote: > The following properties were found by the WG to represent run-time > information and therefore static description of them doesn't have > sufficient utility to warrant adding WSDL extensions to control their > values: > [source endpoint] > [reply endpoint] > [fault endpoint] > [message ID] > > [relationship] is a pair of IRI values, of which one (message > identifier) is run-time and not directly describable in WSDL. > Describing a relationship alone does not provide much value. > To be pedantic, providing a generic way of describing a relationship perhaps does not provide much value. This is to emphasize the fact that there are cases where specifying the relationship IRI statically in WSDL does provide value -- such as in the case of relating two one-way operations in WSDL to provide an async higher level request-response -- but those cases are better served by the usecase specific extensions (which have to be added in any case). -Anish -- > We already are designing mechanisms to control [action]. > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2005 06:25:39 UTC