W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers (why XML?)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:58:54 -0500 (EST)
To: "Vinoski, Stephen" <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>
cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0411240857030.4190-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> I'm all for simplicity, believe me. However, the more I study issue i026, which
> is related to this discussion, the more I'm convinced that there are ways to
> do it without compromising simplicity or focus. More on that later.

Okay, that's great.  Simplicity?  From a (former) Corba guy?  I don't know
if I buy that. :)  (But then, I'm a former DCE guy, where simplicity
doesn't even show up in the three shelf-feet of manuals we published. :)

All kidding aside, I'm in favor of supporting other protocols as long as
it doesn't make the core xml/soap too bad.  Firuing out what "too" means,
is an exercise left for the WG..
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:58:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC