W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: NEW ISSUE: Scope of message addressing properties

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:35:19 -0800
Message-ID: <32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF0BF3C0D5@ussjex01.amer.bea.com>
To: <tom@coastin.com>, "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@sun.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

I'm trying to get up to speed on this.

Could the receiver know whether the ReplyTo was good for an MEP or a
"pan-MEP-MEP" based upon some other information that's in the contract?


Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tom Rutt
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:28 PM
> To: Marc Hadley
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: Scope of message addressing properties
> 
> 
> I have one question:
> 
> If the replyTo can be used for either
> 1 ) a single MEP associated with the message containing the replyTo;
or
> 2) a future mep instance, (e.g., callback) , not associated with the
> message containing the reply To; or
> 3) both uses 1 and 2
> 
> How  does the receiver determin which of the three uses is implied by
> the sender?
> 
> Tom Rutt
> 
> 
> Marc Hadley wrote:
> 
> >
> > Title: Scope of message addressing properties
> >
> > Description: What is the expected scope of each message addressing
> > property. E.g. Does the presence of a wsa:ReplyTo in the response
> > message of a request-response MEP indicate that future messages in
the
> > same 'logical' conversation should be sent to the EPR in the
ReplyTo.
> >
> > Justification: During discussion of issue 28[1] it emerged that
there
> > were different views on the scope of message addressing properties.
> > Some WG members (myself included) assumed that message addressing
> > properties were scoped to a particular instance of an MEP while
others
> > believe that their impact can extend beyond that scope. The
> > specification doesn't appear to support any one view.
> >
> > Target: Core
> >
> > Proposal: This issue requires some discussion by the WG prior to
> > proposing a resolution
> >
> > Marc.
> >
> > [1] See thread starting at:
> > http://www.w3.org/mid/9D1B57A0-3349-11D9-AEEE-000A95BC8D92@Sun.COM
> > ---
> > Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> > Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
> >
> >
> 
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:35:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT