W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: NEW ISSUE: Scope of message addressing properties

From: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:28:06 -0500
Message-ID: <41A39D56.8050908@coastin.com>
To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@sun.com>
CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

I have one question:

If the replyTo can be used for either
1 ) a single MEP associated with the message containing the replyTo;  or
2) a future mep instance, (e.g., callback) , not associated with the 
message containing the reply To; or
3) both uses 1 and 2

How  does the receiver determin which of the three uses is implied by 
the sender?

Tom Rutt


Marc Hadley wrote:

>
> Title: Scope of message addressing properties
>
> Description: What is the expected scope of each message addressing 
> property. E.g. Does the presence of a wsa:ReplyTo in the response 
> message of a request-response MEP indicate that future messages in the 
> same 'logical' conversation should be sent to the EPR in the ReplyTo.
>
> Justification: During discussion of issue 28[1] it emerged that there 
> were different views on the scope of message addressing properties. 
> Some WG members (myself included) assumed that message addressing 
> properties were scoped to a particular instance of an MEP while others 
> believe that their impact can extend beyond that scope. The 
> specification doesn't appear to support any one view.
>
> Target: Core
>
> Proposal: This issue requires some discussion by the WG prior to 
> proposing a resolution
>
> Marc.
>
> [1] See thread starting at: 
> http://www.w3.org/mid/9D1B57A0-3349-11D9-AEEE-000A95BC8D92@Sun.COM
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
>
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:31:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT