And the name that XML 1.1 SHOULD have had given it's lack of backwards compatibility with XML 1.0 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rich Salz > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:56 AM > To: Sanjiva Weerawarana > Cc: paul.downey@bt.com; jmarsh@microsoft.com; public-ws-addressing@w3.org > Subject: Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032] > > > > What's XML 2.0? > > A typo for 1.1 :) > > > -- > Rich Salz Chief Security Architect > DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com > XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html > XML Security Overview > http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html >Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 15:30:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT