> a) Should we describe the specification using XML Schema? > b) Should such a schema replace the "pseudo-schema"? > c) Should such a schema be normative? > d) Should such a schema be developed alongside the spec, or should we > wait until the spec is more stable (i.e., is someone willing to track > the spec)? > > Would you agree? I'd leave "d" as an implementation detail, but yes. (BTW, I'll probably volunteer to keep the schema current if none of the editors want to pick it up.) /r$ -- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.htmlReceived on Friday, 12 November 2004 21:03:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT