W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032]

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:10:33 -0500
Message-ID: <419526C9.4090601@datapower.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
CC: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

>   a) Should we describe the specification using XML Schema?
>   b) Should such a schema replace the "pseudo-schema"?
>   c) Should such a schema be normative?
>   d) Should such a schema be developed alongside the spec, or should we 
> wait until the spec is more stable (i.e., is someone willing to track 
> the spec)?
> Would you agree?

I'd leave "d" as an implementation detail, but yes.  (BTW, I'll probably 
volunteer to keep the schema current if none of the editors want to pick 
it up.)

Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 21:03:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC