W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: i028: Implications of the presence of ReplyTo

From: Brinild <brinild@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:02:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20041112020228.95631.qmail@web61108.mail.yahoo.com>
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org


--- Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com> wrote:
>...And I don't think MEP semantics
> should be inferred from the presence/absence of wsa:
> headers ( although
> the set of such headers could be infered, or even
> explicitly stated, for
> a given MEP ).

Too bad.  The idea of having a self-describing soap
envelope has its appeal.  Also, knowing if its a
request/
response MEP by looking at the message can eliminate
some ambiguity; for example in cases where there are
two port-types with the same operation, one as a
request/response and one as a one-way.

=====
Brinild@yahoo.com
http://brinild.blogspot.com


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 02:03:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT