W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: Why FaultTo?

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:23:17 -0800
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B633803EDBD53@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

There are systems out there that do exactly that. For example, in
message queuing systems, error messages are often sent to a specific
queue.

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Baker
> Sent: 11 November 2004 19:19
> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Why FaultTo?
> 
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I'm not grokking the need for FaultTo.  I can't imagine a situation
> where you'd want a fault response to go someplace different than where
> a non-fault response was headed.  A fault is a specific type of
> response, after all.
> 
> Is there a use case for it that I'm missing?
> 
> Mark.
> -- 
> Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2004 20:23:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT