W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:05:14 -0500 (EST)
To: "Vinoski, Stephen" <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>
cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0411062103280.16255-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> How about a service with both a SOAP binding and a CORBA binding? Or one
> with a CORBA binding, a Tuxedo binding, and an MQ Series binding? Our
> customers have such services in production today. In our world,
> multi-protocol multi-format applications are pretty much commonplace --

Yeah, but does it have to go in the message?

Perhaps a ReplyTo needs all the EPR's, but it seems to me that the
sender-side runtime does *not* need to enumerate all addresses in the
message it's creating.  Does it?
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2004 02:05:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT