W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Action and scope (was: WS-Addr issues)

From: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:07:04 -0800
Message-Id: <5139A9A0-2FA9-11D9-A4C3-000D93ADFB4C@oracle.com>
Cc: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>


On Nov 05, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

>
> Jim,
>
> Communicating the action is explicitly in-scope, as per our charter 
> <http://www.w3.org/2004/09/wsa-charter>.

Just because it is in scope doesn't mean we HAVE to do it.
     jeff
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Jim Webber wrote:
>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> [should have replied to all, appologies]
>>
>>> my electricity bill is sent to "accounts department", "Southern Gas*,
>>> London" accounts department" being the action in this case.
>>
>> Ok - that's a very enlightened view of an action.
>>
>>> endpoints are about /routing/ and action is about /dispatching/ i
>>> don't see how the ws-addressing spec could specify that dispatch
>>> contents must be, say a noun rather than a verb.
>>
>> Endpoints are addressable, and actions are something to do
>> with some activity beyond the enpdoint. Therefore I fail to
>> see how ws-addressing should busy itself worring about
>> dispatching which to my mind is out of scope.
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
> Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
>
>
>
--
Jeff Mischkinsky					jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Director, Web Services Standards		+1(650)506-1975
Consulting Member Technical Staff	500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 4OP9
Oracle Corporation					Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Received on Saturday, 6 November 2004 04:07:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT