W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Action and scope (was: WS-Addr issues)

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:27:31 -0500
Message-Id: <F988B516-2F4F-11D9-B0D5-000A95BD86C0@bea.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>


Communicating the action is explicitly in-scope, as per our charter 


On Nov 5, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Jim Webber wrote:

> Paul
> [should have replied to all, appologies]
>> my electricity bill is sent to "accounts department", "Southern Gas*,
>> London" accounts department" being the action in this case.
> Ok - that's a very enlightened view of an action.
>> endpoints are about /routing/ and action is about /dispatching/ i
>> don't see how the ws-addressing spec could specify that dispatch
>> contents must be, say a noun rather than a verb.
> Endpoints are addressable, and actions are something to do
> with some activity beyond the enpdoint. Therefore I fail to
> see how ws-addressing should busy itself worring about
> dispatching which to my mind is out of scope.

Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 17:27:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC