W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: WS-Addr issues

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:45:31 -0800
Message-ID: <418ABF1B.30600@oracle.com>
To: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>
CC: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Vinoski, Stephen" <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org

I did not see "mandatory" either.
BTW, WSDL 2.0 defines a wsdlLocation attribute which can potentially be 
used.

-Anish
--

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#wsdlLocation-aii

Mark Little wrote:

> +1
> 
> I think making the WSDL contract mandatory in the EPR is too restrictive,
> but I didn't read "mandatory" in Steve's original email.
> 
> Mark.
> 
> ----
> Mark Little,
> Chief Architect,
> Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
> 
> www.arjuna.com
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
> To: "Vinoski, Stephen" <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>; "Doug Davis"
> <dug@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:52 PM
> Subject: RE: WS-Addr issues
> 
> 
> 
>>Hey Steve,
>>
>>
>>>While that's true, it doesn't help unless the contract
>>>address is associated with the EPR such that having the EPR
>>>can get you to the contract.
>>
>>Yes you're right - I'll be more explicit: I think it's OK to not have
>>WSDL contract information embedded in an EPR  provided that the WSDL
>>contract can be obtained using the EPR (for example as part of a
>>WS-MetaDataExchange message exchange).
>>
>>Jim
>>--
>>http://jim.webber.name
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 23:46:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT