W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues)

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:17:26 -0800
Message-ID: <32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF0B834BA5@ussjex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>, "Francisco Curbera" <curbera@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>

Having Mandatory verbs outside of bodies has proven utility and
scalability, like the Web.  The whole point of SOAP is to allow
extensibility that is not achieved with HTTP and is protocol
independent.  Decentralized addition of verbs is a good thing, and SOAP
gives us headers to do exactly that.  

Are you implicitly saying that you don't want decentralized verb
creation, ie protocol specific verbs?  Or that you always want the
decentralized verbs always inside the message?  I can't tell if I'm
having a decentralized verb creation bad argument or a verbs in headers
bad argument.

Dave  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Webber [mailto:Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 2:03 PM
> To: David Orchard; Mark Little; Francisco Curbera
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org; public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues)
> 
> > I don't want to live in the message bodies always contain the
> > verb world any more.
> 
> I don't want to live in the verb for the message body can be found in
> this header over here world either :-)
> 
> wsa:action is inherently a verb (an action).
> 
> Jim
> --
> http://jim.webber.name
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 22:17:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT