RE: WS-Addr issues from Martin Gudgin on 2004-11-04 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from November 2004)

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:15:44 -0800
To: "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, "Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Cc: "Francisco Curbera" <curbera@us.ibm.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B633803DB24F0@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Marc Hadley
> Sent: 04 November 2004 10:27
> To: Savas Parastatidis
> Cc: Francisco Curbera; public-ws-addressing@w3.org; Mark Little
> Subject: Re: WS-Addr issues
> 
> 
> I agree with the desire to make action an optional part of an 
> EPR. This 
> would echo the resolution made by the XMLP WG [1] a couple of 
> years ago 
> wrt SOAPAction (now the action parameter of the application/soap+xml 
> media type).

Action is NOT part of an EPR. So how can we make it optional?

Gudge

Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 19:15:45 UTC