W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: get metadata (was RE: WS-Addr issues

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 07:14:14 -0800
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20041104071414346.00000002360@amalhotr-pc>

Did you mean a single GET verb rather than GetWSDL, GetPolicy, etc.?

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Baker
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:03 AM
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: get metadata (was RE: WS-Addr issues

> I agree that there should be a getmetadata operation that should be 
> usable by anyone not just ws-addressing.  That safely removes it from 
> the scope of ws-addressing without us having to talk about charter and 
> timelines :-)

Well, I think a much stronger case could be made for doing this if the operation were simply "GET" (I thought you were an 80/20 GET guy now, Dave? 8-) and a derefencable URI is used.  Then you only have to specify a new term that means "this resource is metadata about this other resource".  There might already be done, for all I know; a quick scan of Dublin Core didn't turn anything up, but somebody else might have defined one.

Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:15:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:06 UTC