W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2004

RE: NEW ISSUE; wsa:To interaction with application protocols

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:42:21 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DE47@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

if this is to be subsumed by i006 then the title should 
be updated to "Transport Independence" or some such and/or
the description updated. All assuming MarcH as the issue's 
owner is happy with this.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
Sent: 13 December 2004 20:12
To: Downey,PS,Paul,XSJ67A C
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE; wsa:To interaction with application protocols


Hey Paul.

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:43:38PM -0000, paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
> Hi Mark!
>  
> i think this is closely related to issue 6 "Message Property Optionality":
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i006

Good catch!
 
> AIUI you'd like an addressing xxTo: value to map to an populate a transport 
> xxTo: value, whereas Marc is suggesting that a missing addressing xxTo: 
> could default to to a value derrived from the transport.

s/transport/transfer/, but yah, exactly.

> i guess both issues raise an issue with the way the spec is structured given 
> that the SOAP and WSDL bindings are thus far "transport-neutral". 

Definitely.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 13:41:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:00 GMT