W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

RE: Fixing tests for ReplyTo of none [was : WSO2 -> Axis issues (PLEASE READ, SPEC/TEST ISSUES)]

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:02:38 -0500
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B2701986DF9@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: "Kevin Conner" <Kevin.Conner@jboss.com>, <paul.downey@bt.com>
Cc: <dims@wso2.com>, <mark.little@jboss.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>


> > We could do this iteratively, but it sounds like something 
> best done 
> > during a pre-arranged slot?
> 
> The changes proposed by Glen appear to have a minimal impact 
> on our implementation/testsuite.  I'm happy to do this 
> iteratively or during a pre-arranged slot.

Either way is good with me too.  I just sent the new test markup.

I would also suggest adding new assertions:

count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:ReplyTo) = 0 or
soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:ReplyTo/wsa:Address =
'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous'

..to tests 1140,1142,1143,1144,1146,1240,1242,1243,1244,1246, and 1247.
And potentially the same thing with FaultTo....

--G
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 00:04:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC