W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

New test

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:55:05 -0500
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B2701986DF7@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>


Here's the test I was suggesting, in what I hope is the right format.

Should we do both a SOAP 1.1 and a SOAP 1.2 version of this?

--G

  <testcase xml:id="test1149"
    cr="REQUIRED">
    <title>SOAP 1.1 two-way message with a duplicate To header and a
ReplyTo of none.</title>
    <description><![CDATA[Two-way message exchange containing a
duplicate To header and ReplyTo of none.  An InvalidAddressingHeader
fault should be generated, but not sent due to the ReplyTo
header.]]></description>
    <features>
	<feature>soap08</feature>
      <feature>core10</feature>
    </features>
    <message-exchange type="SOAP11-HTTP-In-Out-Fault"
addr-binding="soap11">
	<message from="A" to="B"
document="echo/soap11/duplicateToRequest.xml" name="message">
	    <assert test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:To) =
2"/> 
          <assert
test="soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:ReplyTo/wsa:Address =
'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none'">
          <assert test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:FaultTo)
= 0"/>
	</message>
	<message from="B" to="A"/>
    </message-exchange>
  </testcase>
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 23:56:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:45 GMT