W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Mostly red report

From: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:12:19 -0800
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>, WS-Addressing Tests <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
Message-id: <440CA5B3.1020408@sun.com>

Still needs to be fixed.

-Arun

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Did this get fixed, or is it something I still have to investigate?
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Arun Gupta [mailto:Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM]
>>Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 10:20 PM
>>To: Jonathan Marsh
>>Cc: David Illsley; WS-Addressing Tests; public-ws-addressing-tests-
>>request@w3.org
>>Subject: Re: Mostly red report
>>
>>Thanks a lot!
>>
>>test1251 for Sun->Sun fails with the following assertion:
>>
>>not(soap12:Envelope/soap12:Header/wsa:ReplyTo/wsa:Address =
>>'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous')
>>
>>The SOAP request message contains two ReplyTo address, one with "none"
>>env:Role and one without. The second ReplyTo contains non-anonymous
>>address. Is it possible that the assertions are checking only for the
>>first ReplyTo address and reporting the test as failed ?
>>
>>-Arun
>>
>>Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>>
>>>Done (by Paul).  Turned a few greens to red, pending implementation
> 
> of
> 
>>>the updated testcase.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>>>*From:* David Illsley [mailto:david.illsley@uk.ibm.com]
>>>*Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2006 2:19 AM
>>>*To:* Arun Gupta
>>>*Cc:* Jonathan Marsh; WS-Addressing Tests;
>>>public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>>>*Subject:* Re: Mostly red report
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Sorry Arun, I said I'd do that.
>>>
>>>I've just tried and for some reason I can't commit to CVS... getting
> 
> a
> 
>>>uesless error message :-(
>>>
>>>It's a pretty simple change - change the description to indicate an
>>>application fault, add an assertion:
>>>        <assert
>>>test="not(../following-
>>
>>sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase
>>
>>>and @message!='1']) or
>>>
> 
> count(../following-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase
> 
>>>and @message!='1']/log:content/*) = 0"/>
>>>
>>>and remove the assertions for ant messages 2,3,4
>>>
>>>Paul, Hugo, Jonathan, could one of you do this for me as I can't get
> 
> CVS
> 
>>>to work?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>David
>>>
>>>David Illsley
>>>Web Services Development
>>>MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>>>+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
>>>david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
>>>
>>>*Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>*
>>>Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>>>
>>>02/03/2006 17:31
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
>>>
>>>cc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>David Illsley/UK/IBM@IBMGB, WS-Addressing Tests
>>><public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>,
>>>public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>>>
>>>Subject
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Re: Mostly red report
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Sun logs don't get past 1234...
>>>
>>>I do see Sun logs beyond 1234, so not sure what you meant here.
>>>
>>>Also, it seems like 1152 and 1252 descriptions have not been updated
> 
> and
> 
>>>that's why Sun logs are failing on that. We agreed on the last call
> 
> that
> 
>>>this would send a non-anonymous ReplyTo and none FaultTo. The
> 
> endpoint
> 
>>>will throw a fault and will not be sent back to the client.
>>>
>>>-Arun
>>>
>>>
>>>> We will remove tests 1145 and 1245 tomorrow, per WG decisions.
> 
> Also
> 
>>>> 1260 will likely be dropped or moved to INFORMATIVE.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: Arun Gupta [mailto:Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM]
>>>>>Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:11 AM
>>>>>To: David Illsley
>>>>>Cc: Jonathan Marsh; WS-Addressing Tests;
> 
> public-ws-addressing-tests-
> 
>>>>>request@w3.org
>>>>>Subject: Re: Mostly red report
>>>>>
>>>>>test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and
> 
> endpoints
> 
>>>>>updated.
>>>>>
>>>>>I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can
>>>>
>>>> that
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ?
>>>>>
>>>>>I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an
>>>>>explanation there before I implement it.
>>>>>
>>>>>-Arun
>>>>>
>>>>>David Illsley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Looks  better :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of
> 
> a
> 
>>>> lack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for
>>>>
>>>> 1251).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>I think the following should fix it so that only message elements
> 
> in
> 
>>>> the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In mkschema.xsl:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                                               <xsl:if
>>>>
>>>> test="$num!=1">
>>>>
>>>>>>                                                       <xsl:if
>>>>>>test="count(./s:assert)>0">
>>>>>>
>>>>>><sch:rule
>>>>
>>>> context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']">
>>>>
>>>>>><sch:assert
>>>>>>test="following-
>>>>>
> sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assert
> 
>>>> io
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>n
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of
>>>>>>select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/>
>>>>>>failed</sch:assert>
>>>>>>
>>>>></sch:rule>
>>>>>
>>>>>>                                                       </xsl:if>
>>>>>>                                               </xsl:if>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the
>>>>>>Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws
> 
> up
> 
>>>> any
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>red we aren't expecting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this
> 
> evening
> 
>>>>>>(it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>David Illsley
>>>>>>Web Services Development
>>>>>>MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>>>>>>+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
>>>>>>david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>*"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>*
>>>>>>Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>02/03/2006 14:50
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>To
>>>>>>                "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>,
> 
> "WS-Addressing
> 
>>Tests"
>>
>>>>>><public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
>>>>>>cc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Subject
>>>>>>                RE: Mostly red report
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side
> 
> effect.
> 
>>>>>>Checked in a version I'm more confident in.  The next rebuild
> 
> will
> 
>>>> tell.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>>>>
>>>> [mailto:public-ws-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
>>>>>>>Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM
>>>>>>>To: WS-Addressing Tests
>>>>>>>Subject: Mostly red report
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from
> 
> mostly
> 
>>>>>>green
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-Arun
>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>got Web Services ?
>>>>>>>Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>>>>>>>http://java.sun.com/webservices
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>got Web Services ?
>>>>>Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>>>>>http://java.sun.com/webservices
>>>
>>>--
>>>got Web Services ?
>>>Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>>>http://java.sun.com/webservices
>>>
>>
>>--
>>got Web Services ?
>>Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>>http://java.sun.com/webservices
> 
> 

-- 
got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Monday, 6 March 2006 21:10:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC