W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Saturday Morning, 4th March

From: Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:53:59 +0000
Message-ID: <440A1A87.2030108@jboss.com>
To: paul.downey@bt.com
CC: dims@wso2.com, Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM, jmarsh@microsoft.com, public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org

Our site appears down, so I've set up an alternate for the logs:

http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/

This has all of the logs as they were yesterday (apologies if the format 
isn't right).

If you go there, you'll be presented with a web page enabling individual 
or collective downloads.

    * JBoss-to-IBM
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-ibm.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-ibm.xml)
    * JBoss-to-JBoss
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-jboss.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-jboss.xml)
    * JBoss-to-MSFT SOAP 1.1
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-msft-1.1.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-msft-1.1.xml)
    * JBoss-to-MSFT SOAP 1.2
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-msft-1.2.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-msft-1.2.xml)
    * JBoss-to-MSFT Test 1150
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-msft-1150.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-msft-1150.xml)
    * JBoss-to-MSFT Test 1152
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-msft-1152.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-msft-1152.xml)
    * JBoss-to-Sun SOAP 1.1
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-sun-1.1.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-sun-1.1.xml)
    * JBoss-to-Sun SOAP 1.2
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-sun-1.2.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-sun-1.2.xml)
    * JBoss-to-Apache
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/jboss-apache.xml>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/jboss-apache.xml)
    * All logs (tar.gz)
      <http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/%7Emark/logs/logs.tar.gz>
      (http://88-111-144-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com/~mark/logs/logs.tar.gz)


Mark.


Mark Little wrote:
>
> Paul, I take it these ...
>
> http://213.162.124.157:8080/interop/logs/jboss-msft-1.1.xml
> http://213.162.124.157:8080/interop/logs/jboss-msft-1.2.xml
> http://213.162.124.157:8080/interop/logs/jboss-msft-1150.xml
> http://213.162.124.157:8080/interop/logs/jboss-msft-1152.xml
>
> http://213.162.124.157:8080/interop/logs/jboss-sun-1.1.xml
> http://213.162.124.157:8080/interop/logs/jboss-sun-1.2.xml
>
> don't help because of the "vi problem" too? If not, let me know and 
> I'll see what I can do at my end, as Kevin is unavailable.
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
> paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
>> show me the URIs!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@jboss.com]
>> Sent: Sat 3/4/2006 12:36 PM
>> To: dims@wso2.com
>> Cc: Downey,P,Paul,CXMA C; Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM; jmarsh@microsoft.com; 
>> public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Saturday Morning, 4th March
>>  
>> No JBoss-to-IBM, JBoss-to-JBoss, JBoss-to-MSFT or JBoss-to-WSO2 
>> either :-(
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>  
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> IBM->WSO2 is missing from the matrix? I'll send an update today for 
>>> the bad stuff. Yes, i will send a url :)
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> dims
>>>
>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>      
>>>> Hi Paul. Comments inline.
>>>>
>>>> paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>> Arun, All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been periodically slurping the logs down from people's servers,
>>>>> in as friendly US timezone as my need to sleep allowed :)
>>>>>
>>>>> It takes special manual effort to processs logs sent by Email, and
>>>>> we've seen a bunch of these sent this week during the F2F.
>>>>> It's therefore possible regression may have been introduced on both
>>>>> the actor and observer sides of the shop :)
>>>>>
>>>>> - I can't access the JBoss server (I get a timeout), and looking
>>>>> at the attachments see we have to assemble them into the single
>>>>> log file the report expects for each interaction?
>>>>>                 
>>>> Apologies, as we thought we were adhering to the required log format.
>>>> Can you point me in the right direction and we'll change asap?
>>>>          
>>>>> Still no log server from WSO2, that would be very helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>> So really it's not been ideal for us to work on this, this week,
>>>>> but maybe we can all pull it together during next week.
>>>>>
>>>>> *IMPORTANT NOTICE*
>>>>> As the matrix is now getting large, and time is running out, Jonathan
>>>>> and I have decided we can no longer accommodate ad-hoc log files sent
>>>>> in ad-hoc ways and formats - you need to provide a log directory on a
>>>>> web site with one log file per interaction to all the other parties
>>>>> in either WS-I or our own format to make it onto the report.   
>>>>>               
>>>> Shouldn't be a problem if you can provide the reference.
>>>>          
>>>>> *IMPORTANT NOTICE*
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>              
>>>>>> And also the WS-I monitor changes the wsa:To header which the
>>>>>> Microsoft stack does not seem to like. I'll try to make these 
>>>>>> changes
>>>>>> over the weekend and send updated logs.
>>>>>>                       
>>>>> bizare!
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>              
>>>>>> test1152 and 1252 still needs to be fixed in the CVS repository. 
>>>>>> They
>>>>>> are still checking for 4 messages whereas they should only be 2.
>>>>>>                       
>>>>> we've been working on that - David had a fix which we've added:
>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-tests/2006Mar/0029.html 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>              
>>>>>> I cant meet tuesday morning since I'll be travelling tuesday through
>>>>>> thursday. I can do monday or friday morning instead.
>>>>>>                       
>>>>> Monday and friday evenings aren't great for me, but I've
>>>>> been working with Jonathan so as not to become "the weakest link"
>>>>> and so together we can cover 2/3rs of the timezones :)
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>              
>>>>>> Can you please regenerate the report by picking up the logs for
>>>>>> Sun->Sun, Sun->IBM, Sun->Axis, Sun->JBoss from [1] ? This will 
>>>>>> give a
>>>>>> better idea of the current status.
>>>>>>                       
>>>>> have been doing so, Arun, maybe you'd like to add WSO2 to your 
>>>>> matrix,
>>>>> and refresh the Microsoft log, it's as old as the hills:
>>>>>  
>>>>>    Sun-Microsoft.xml     86.9 kb     Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:25:08 GMT
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://soapinterop.java.sun.com:8080/wsalogs/.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can everyone please try to add logs for all other endpoints:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/endpoints/
>>>>>
>>>>> State of play after our hack this morning:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/report/
>>>>>
>>>>> still getting problems with lots of white boxes in the Sun columns,
>>>>> can't reach the JBoss log file server
>>>>>               
>>>> That should be up soon.
>>>>          
>>>>>  and I'm still getting bad prefix 'echo' from some of the WSO2 log
>>>>> files  which
>>>>> breaks the processor and now makes their column all 'bad'.
>>>>>                 
>>>> Mark.
>>>>          
>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>>>                 
>>>>           
>>> - --
>>> Davanum Srinivas (dims@wso2.com)
>>> VP/Engg, WSO2 (http://wso2.com)
>>> Yahoo IM: dims Cell/Mobile: +1 (508) 415 7509
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
>>>
>>> iD8DBQFECXzQgNg6eWEDv1kRAu83AKCdCu/sgztyFURb6G+7Y4psvdwEEACeMGA8
>>> XQbR9R7/ojOv+zq+0PVtpA8=
>>> =kuS5
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>       
>>
>>   
>
Received on Saturday, 4 March 2006 22:54:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC