W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

RE: Mostly red report

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:20:52 -0800
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E801CAA1BA@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "David Illsley" <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: "WS-Addressing Tests" <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org>

Hit send too fast.

Microsoft log numbering is causing failures past 1150.  We're looking
for message='3' when the log says message='2' on these cases.  Needs
investigation.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:19 AM
> To: 'Arun Gupta'; David Illsley
> Cc: WS-Addressing Tests; public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Mostly red report
> 
> We just updated the results again:
> 
> Added a new log from Glen running the Microsoft public client against
the
> Axis endpoint.  51% pass, rest aren't getting enough debug information
to
> figure out what's going on.
> 
> Added 2 WSO2 logs.
> 
> Tried to fix the problem of ensuring each test has the right number of
> messages.   Still some strange behavior around 1251 on Sun though to
> investigate.
> 
> Sun logs don't get past 1234...
> 
> We will remove tests 1145 and 1245 tomorrow, per WG decisions.  Also
1260
> will likely be dropped or moved to INFORMATIVE.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Arun Gupta [mailto:Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:11 AM
> > To: David Illsley
> > Cc: Jonathan Marsh; WS-Addressing Tests; public-ws-addressing-tests-
> > request@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Mostly red report
> >
> > test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and endpoints
> > updated.
> >
> > I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can
that
> > be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ?
> >
> > I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an
> > explanation there before I implement it.
> >
> > -Arun
> >
> > David Illsley wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks  better :-)
> > >
> > > ...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of
a
> lack
> > > of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for
1251).
> > >
> > > I think the following should fix it so that only message elements
in
> the
> > > testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required.
> > >
> > > In mkschema.xsl:
> > >
> > >                                                 <xsl:if
> test="$num!=1">
> > >                                                         <xsl:if
> > > test="count(./s:assert)>0">
> > >
> > > <sch:rule
> context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']">
> > >
> > > <sch:assert
> > > test="following-
> >
>
sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assert
io
> > n
> > > "all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of
> > > select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/>
> > > failed</sch:assert>
> > >
> > </sch:rule>
> > >                                                         </xsl:if>
> > >                                                 </xsl:if>
> > >
> > > This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the
> > > Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws
up
> any
> > > red we aren't expecting?
> > >
> > > I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this
evening
> > > (it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues).
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > David
> > >
> > > David Illsley
> > > Web Services Development
> > > MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> > > +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> > > david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
> > >
> > >
> > > *"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>*
> > > Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
> > >
> > > 02/03/2006 14:50
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > > 	"Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests"
> > > <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
> > > cc
> > >
> > > Subject
> > > 	RE: Mostly red report
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side
effect.
> > > Checked in a version I'm more confident in.  The next rebuild will
> tell.
> > >
> > >
> > >  > -----Original Message-----
> > >  > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-
> > >  > addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
> > >  > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM
> > >  > To: WS-Addressing Tests
> > >  > Subject: Mostly red report
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  > The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from
mostly
> > > green
> > >  > to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ?
> > >  >
> > >  > -Arun
> > >  > --
> > >  > got Web Services ?
> > >  > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
> > >  > http://java.sun.com/webservices
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > got Web Services ?
> > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
> > http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:21:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC