W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Proposal: New tests with addressing none uri

From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:11:51 +0100
To: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
Cc: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFE3FA18FB.021E0C74-ON802571BC.0058A365-802571BC.0058CD5C@uk.ibm.com>

Well I think it's be a useful test to show what the implementations do so 
that others might do the right thing in the future.
I'm also somewhat of the opinion (though haven't implemented it as such) 
that it perhaps should be a special case within the WSDL binding doc and 
the test will flush it out and allow a wider discussion.
Do you have an objection to me adding these tests?
David

David Illsley
Web Services Development
MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
david.illsley@uk.ibm.com



Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM> 
Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
07/31/2006 04:57 PM

To
David Illsley/UK/IBM@IBMGB
cc
public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
Subject
Re: Proposal: New tests with addressing none uri







Hi David,

I think from WSDL Binding perspective, there are two types of addresses: 
anonymous and non-anonymous. With that I'd qualify none URI as 
non-anonymous.

What additional feature of WSDL Binding do you think this might test 
otherwise ?

-Arun

David Illsley wrote:
> I think it would be good to have a tests for anonymous=required with 
> request messages with ReplyTo/FaultTo=none uri.
> I'm not 100% what the correct behavior would be so feels like a good 
> interop test. Thoughts?
> David
> 
> David Illsley
> Web Services Development
> MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> david.illsley@uk.ibm.com

-- 
got Web Services ?
Download and Contribute Web Services Interoperability Technology (WSIT)
http://java.sun.com/webservices/interop
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 16:10:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:45 GMT