W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > November 2005

RE: note from WS-Addressing Test Suite TF call 2 Nov 2005

From: Mike Vernal <Mike.Vernal@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:38:26 -0800
Message-ID: <25D7C3B6D41DFF47B4083F1D2FDEE01808B4E511@RED-MSG-51.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>

In case anyone was worried, the klaxons in the background ended up being
a false alarm.  ;)

Sorry for the interruption,
-mike

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
paul.downey@bt.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:36 AM
To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
Subject: note from WS-Addressing Test Suite TF call 2 Nov 2005


Present: Mark Nottingham, Paul Downey, David Hull, Mike Vernal, David
Illsley

discussion in general around the test suite status and requirements for
CR

.. test cases for addressing soap CR and timing of interop event

.. timing of interop event and WSDL CR testing

.. do we merge the WSDL CR testing with an interop event, 
   hold one separately later,
   or not have one at all?

.. we should concentrate on CR exit for core and soap, WSDL will come
later

pauld: still lacking in some test cases, sending WSDL and other
meta-data, for example

dhull: lack of specifications for some of our scenarios which go beyond
request/response

mnot: wants to walk through tests at the F2F and validate them and their
methodology

dhull: we need to walk through the features

pauld: wants to better understand i059 when it comes to writing WSDL for
the test cases

mnot: rules for formulating a reply message changed in the editors'
draft, will impact features list
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:39:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:41 UTC