Re: Revised draft charter for WoT WG

Actually, in order to record the discussion and resolution on this
particular aspect, I have opened
https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/288

Please answer there. Thank you.

Best regards,
Zoltan


On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Kis, Zoltan <zoltan.kis@intel.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask the group whether could we replace "Scripting API"
> occurrences in the charter with "Scripting and REST API".
>
> Based on my experience with IoT so far, I believe we can make a better
> Scripting API when thinking about a REST API as well.
>
> So it would be nice if the charter allowed to work on specifications to
> both a Scripting and a REST API.
>
> Personally I would be interested to work on both.
>
> [ I have made a comment on #286 as well].
>
> Best regards,
> Zoltan
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Mccool, Michael <michael.mccool@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Now with an actual attachment.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Mccool, Michael
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 7, 2016 22:26
>> *To:* Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* Revised draft charter for WoT WG
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is an HTML diff of the draft WoT WG charter, which is currently
>> under review.   If you have any comments, please post a comment on the
>> github pull request at:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/286
>>
>> Michael McCool
>>
>>
>>
>
>