Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Allow disabling of default scroll restoration behavior from Anne van Kesteren on 2015-07-13 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from July 2015)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:26:09 +0200
To: Majid Valipour <majidvp@chromium.org>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
Message-ID: <CADnb78jAoNj0NYGT3e3jr7H_RLZpKR6oh5pD7dHxnv4hfJWu5g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Majid Valipour <majidvp@chromium.org> wrote:
> It is only used as way to group properties (perhaps similar to
> ValidityState?) and to keep History interface clean and stack-like. If that
> is not valuable enough to introduce a new interface then putting these on
> the History interface is fine.

I personally prefer flatter structures, but you're correct that
there's precedent for both and given a 1:1 relationship without setter
it does seem rather harmless.

-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 14:26:39 UTC