- From: Majid Valipour <majidvp@chromium.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:58:47 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, Majid Valipour <majidvp@chromium.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 1:51 PM Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > > I think we've already made that assumption given that history.state > > already relies on this. > > Good point. I'm still somewhat skeptical of introducing new objects > just for the purpose of grouping some properties if they don't serve a > purpose on their own. > It is only used as way to group properties (perhaps similar to ValidityState?) and to keep History interface clean and stack-like. If that is not valuable enough to introduce a new interface then putting these on the History interface is fine. Majid
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 13:59:25 UTC