- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 08:55:02 +0100
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On 2015-01-07 08:52, Simon Pieters wrote: > ... >> I hear (a) these pages have been broken in IE for a long time, and (b) >> only 23 (?) pages in your DB are found. > > Right. > >> So why not just leave them broken? > > It's a worse user experience and it's a shorter path to interop to > change IE. > ... User experience for invalid content is one aspect; sane parsing rules are another one. Not requiring the parameter name will make it harder to introduce new parameters in the future. YMMV. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2015 07:55:38 UTC