W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2012

Re: [whatwg] maincontent element spec updated and supporting data provided

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:09:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+c2ei_GxvmyO3i0+AC-zpC-KLUkwScC7fZ9fWQW8K2JcsM85g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Ian Yang <ian@invigoreight.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>
> I just wanted to make sure everyone is clear that this <maincontent> part
> is not part of the HTML specification, and is not a WHATWG specification.
> We have previously had miscommunications about this kind of thing, e.g.
> with responsive images, where there was some expectation from some people
> that if a proposal got written up, it would be adopted. This is not the
> case; what decides whether a proposal is adopted or not is whether it has
> real use cases and compelling reasoning.

I thought the requirement was that it got adoption by implementations?

> In the case of <maincontent>, there is no problem to be solved, and there
> is no use case that isn't already adequately handled by HTML.

I believe there are different opinions about this. I don't have a
strong opinion myself, but I don't believe the case is as clear-cut as
the above sentence makes it sound.

> Naturally, anyone is welcome to make proposals and discuss use cases, but
> I would encourage people participating on this mailing list to focus first
> on establishing use cases, to avoid returning to topics that have
> previously been discussed without adding new information, and to avoid
> discussing minutiae of proposals before firmly establishing that there are
> solid use cases.

Agreed.

/ Jonas
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 03:10:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:11 GMT