W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2012

Re: [whatwg] [canvas] Path object

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:59:11 -0700
To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Message-ID: <DE98E83E-BB40-41B8-90BC-7EA8DE256B21@adobe.com>
Cc: "whatwg@lists.whatwg.org" <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Can you please move this discussion to another thread and discuss the Path object on this thread?


On Oct 5, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>> Yes, but at the cost of performance and memory usage that just doesn't
>> seem worthwhile here.
> Is there really a nontrivial cost to a one-time warning, the first time a
> window attribute is resolved this way?  (Warning once per ID would be nice,
> but warning once per page load serves the purpose.)  It sounds like a
> single branch at most.
> And web developers get annoyed when UAs warn about various spec-compliant
>> stuff they're doing, in my experience.
> I'm a web developer, and I get annoyed at not being told when I'm doing
> something obviously bad, so you'll have to pick which group to annoy:
> people who want to write reliable webpages, or those who don't.
> -- 
> Glenn Maynard
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 21:59:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:17 UTC