- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:47:37 +0200
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:14:54 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: > Though possibly a safer way to think about it is that the Content-Type > header should always be inspected to see if a preflight is needed, no > matter if the header is set by the page or by the implementation. > > I think I like the latter approach more since it seems safer. Bah, Content-Type sucks. I created a new thread on public-webapps at w3.org to further discuss this (as well as something else I noticed): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1222.html (I already renamed "custom request headers" to "author request headers". I hope that will reduce some of the confusion I and others had with respect to Last-Event-ID and Cache-Control. I should probably add a note too at some point, once I find an appropriate location.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 05:47:37 UTC