- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:00:03 -0700
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:49:53 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: >> >> The problem is if we want to allow people to use already existing >> scripts then they are likely often not in UTF-8. >> >> Most scripts will probably not work out-of-the box anyway since there >> is no access to DOM. But purely computational libraries should work. > > Would such libraries have a lot of non-UTF-8 characters? It's the web so yes, I would assume there are some amount of non-UTF-8 characters. Hard to say how much of course. > Also, it's not that > hard to encode something as UTF-8 these days and the reduced complexity > would be a nice benefit. Do such tools always insert a BOM as well? So that it's safe to reuse the script both for <script> and for workers? / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 16:00:03 UTC