W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2008

[whatwg] several messages

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0802030233240.31193@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Philip Taylor wrote:
>
> Maybe the desired properties are:
> - drawImage(<img>) onto a displayed <canvas> should look the same as
> the original <img>, regardless of whether the image has gamma etc.
> - toDataURL should return the same raw pixel data as getImageData, at
> least for image/png (though other formats might make that impossible),
> for consistency.
> - drawImage(toDataURL()) should have no effect.

Made explicit.


> I'd also like:
> - fillStyle = 'rgb(r, g, b)'; fillRect(...); getImageData returns
> exactly [r, g, b, 255].
> mainly because that makes it possible to write test cases that use
> getImageData to check the results.

That was already explicit.


> > > "function FillCload(data, x, y) { ... }" - should be "function
> > > FillCloud(data, x, y) { ... }".
> 
> That error was replaced with "function AddCload(data, x, y) { ... }" - s/a/u/

Fixed.


On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
> [...]

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Darin Adler wrote:
>
> [...]

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, L. David Baron wrote:
>
> [...]

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> [...]

I didn't see anything in this discussion that I could apply to the spec, 
but please do let me know if there's anything in the <canvas> requirements 
that should change (or be added).

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 2 February 2008 22:57:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:39 UTC